The HMA Law Firm - Immigration & Criminal Defense Lawyers

Call: 703.964.0245

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Practice
    • Immigration >
      • Employment-Based Immigration >
        • The H-1B Visa
        • Investor and Intracompany Transfers (E & L Visas)
        • PERM Labor Certification >
          • Cross Chargeability
          • EB-5 Green Cards
      • Marriage & Fiancé Visas >
        • Special Service for Servicemen
        • Marriage Interview Questions
        • The I-751 Good Faith Waiver
        • Evidence for Filing an I-751
        • My I-751 Was Denied: Now What?
        • Same-Sex Marriage Immigration Issues
        • New 90 Day Rule
      • General Immigration >
        • Filing a FOIA from USCIS
        • Form G-639: How to Complete
        • Re-Entry Permits
        • TPS >
          • More on TPS
          • SYRIA TPS
          • TPS Yemen
        • U Visas
      • Legal Victories
      • How To Choose The Right Immigration Lawyer
      • Waivers (I-601/I-601A) >
        • Drunk Driving (DUI/DWI) and I-601/I-601A Waivers
      • Citizenship >
        • N-648 Medical Waivers
        • Naturalization Pitfalls
        • The Civics Test for Naturalization
        • Exceptions for English Test
        • Criminal Convictions and Naturalization
      • Mandamus: It's Taking Too Long >
        • Mandamus: What to Think, What to Expect
        • How an Immigration Writ of Mandamus Works
        • Petition for Hearing on Naturalization
      • Deportation Defense >
        • Overview of Removal Proceedings
        • Deportation: Preventive Maintenance
      • Deferred Action (DACA) >
        • To Lawyer Or Not To Lawyer
        • Applying for a Social Security Number
    • Criminal Defense >
      • Traffic Offenses
    • Learn >
      • Immigration In A Nutshell >
        • The Visa Bulletin and Family Immigration
      • Criminal Immigration Law 101 >
        • Know Your Rights
      • Eligibility for Citizenship >
        • Citizenship versus Naturalization
        • Why Become a Citizen?
  • Consult/Pay Fees
  • Testimonials
  • Careers
  • Blawg
  • En Español
    • Accion Ejecutiva
    • El Interdicto Temporal
    • Buscar Detenido
    • Reforma Inmigratoria
    • Papeles Por Los Indocumentados

The HMA Law Firm Blawg

    Question? Contact a lawyer now!

Submit

The Virginia Supreme Court Sets Up A Great Fall...

11/30/-0001

1 Comment

 
...for immigrants who already got the short end of the stick.  On January 13, 2011 the Virginia Supreme Court (VSC) reversed the decisions of two circuit court judges granting modification of sentences in which the defendants did not receive proper advice regarding the immigration consequences of their pleas.  In Commonwealth v. Morris, the defendant was convicted of petit larceny, and received a 12 month sentence with all but 1 month suspended.  In Commonwealth v. Chan, the defendant was convicted of simple assault and battery and received a 12 month suspended sentence.  Under the immigration law, both of these convictions are \"aggravated felonies\".  They mean virtually automatic deportation.  A 364 day sentence, on the other hand, would have given them a way to stay.  So they went back to court to ask for their sentences to be reduced by 1 day by filing writs of coram nobis (also called coram vobis) and audita querela.  The circuit court judges agreed, saying that because they didn\'t receive proper advice from their lawyers, there was a problem with the sentences.  The Commonwealth of Virginia appealed to the VSC, which declared that this was not the type of error that can be corrected by coram nobis, and that under no circumstance could audita querela be used to modify any criminal sentence or conviction in Virginia.

The rules for postconviction relief vary from state to state.  All states have an interest, of course, in convictions being final.   So it\'s usually pretty difficult to get cases reopened.  In Virginia, there are normally appeals that can be taken immediately after a sentence, and there is also the writ of habeus corpus (Va. Code 8.01-654 et seq) with time limits up to 2 years (sometimes a bit longer depending on how long an original appeal took).

The problem is that this doesn\'t fit well for immigrants who have sentences that get them in trouble because of their lawyers\' ineffective assistance.  It has to do with how aggravated felonies work.

Since the creation of the term “aggravated felony” in the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 , its subsequent revamping in the Immigration Act of 1990 and finally the passage of IIRAIRA in 1996, the law has made deportation virtually certain for an ever-increasing class of aliens, some of whom now face the harshest of penalties for crimes that did not even render them removable when they were convicted.  It really wasn\'t until the Padilla v. Kentucky decision of the US Supreme Court in March 2010 that the law began to appreciate that you can\'t have a system where you mete out criminal and criminal-like punishments without corresponding constitutional safeguards.  So you have a lot of people who have convictions on their records that they perhaps did not even know had turned into aggravated felonies.  Or for years, criminal defense attorneys failed to advise their clients about the immigration consequences of their pleas.  For these unlucky people, the time periods to challenge their convictions has long since passed.  They have no right to appeal, or to file a writ of habeus corpus.

I will admit: \"aggravated felony\" sounds bad.  \"Aggravated felon\" sounds pretty dark and dangerous, too.  In many cases, the crimes that fall into this category are bad and dark and dangerous: murder, rape, sexual abuse of a minor, drug trafficking, terrorism.  No one would seriously question that these crimes are not only felonies, but aggravated in the sense that they are certainly not entry-level offenses like driving without insurance.

But the inclusion of other crimes in the list (which you can find in section 101(a)(43) of the Immigration & Nationality Act) makes you scratch your head.  For example, 101(a)(43)(G) states that any crime of theft where the sentence imposed is 1 year or more (even if the sentence is suspended entirely and the defendant doesn\'t serve a day in jail) is also an aggravated felony.  You could steal a bag of potato chips, be charged with petty larceny, plead guilty, be given a 1 year sentence, suspended entirely so you don\'t spend a minute in jail.  Under this scenario, immigration law will consider you an aggravated felon.

Clearly, stealing potato chips, or anything for that matter, is wrong.  That\'s not the point, however. Does it make sense to place the potato chip thief in the same category as the murderer, rapist, sexual deviant, drug trafficker, or terrorist? 

The Supreme Court recognized this in Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder 590 U.S. ___  (2010): \"Congress, like \'Humpty Dumpty,\' has the power to give words unorthodox meanings...[citations omitted]..But in this case the Government argues for a result that \"the English language tells us not to expect,\" so we must be \"very wary of the Government\'s position.\"

There must be a legal vehicle for defendants who got the short end of the stick to redress their grievances in court.  The normal procedures for postconviction relief in Virginia, after the Morris decision by the VSC, clearly don\'t provide enough protection.  Most defendants\' convictions are too old.  That\'s why the writs of coram nobis and audita querela were so important: in the wake of Padilla, they provided perhaps the only way to correct a constitutional error.  No more.

\"When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
\"The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”

-Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass (1872)
1 Comment
chanel outlet link
7/21/2014 04:55:25 pm

Randy Fowler message or calls like level connected with prices progress this Mythic-Literal Level.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    DISCLAIMER: If a blog post you read here contains case results, be advised that case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case.

    Authors

    Sharifa Abbasi, Esq.
    Hassan M. Ahmad, Esq.
    Humza Kazmi, Esq.
    Faisal Khan
    ​Valeria Prudencio
    Carly Stadum-Liang, Esq.

    Archives

    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    May 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    August 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    July 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010

    Categories

    All
    Appellate
    Asylum
    CBP
    Citizenship
    Constitutional Rights
    Criminal
    DACA
    Deportation
    Family
    Framing
    General
    H 1B
    H-1B
    Hma Law Firm
    Immigration
    Immigration Policy
    Immigration Reform
    International
    Interns
    Muslim Ban
    National Security
    Politics
    Removal
    Syria
    Tanton FOIA Lawsuit
    Trump
    Waivers

    RSS Feed

Quick Links

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Executive Action
  • Consult

Contact Info

8133 Leesburg Pike, Ste 801
Vienna VA 22182

Tel:  703.964.0245

Fax: 703.997.8556
Email: info@hmalegal.com

Subscribe to the HMA LawFeed

Picture

​Pay Fees Here

Book you consult online by clicking on this link now!

©2009 - 2021 by Hassan M. Ahmad. All rights reserved. No portion of this website may be copied or reproduced for any purpose without express written permission.

Photos used under Creative Commons from Beshroffline, Thorne Enterprises, alex-s, swanksalot, 401(K) 2012, hyku, Gage Skidmore, Gage Skidmore, michaeln3, Antony J Shepherd, Korean Resource Center 민족학교, Don Fulano, lewebafricain, Images_of_Money, Lord Jim, Kevinth Nunez, Joe Crimmings Photography, Cohen.Canada, Thane Eichenauer, Gage Skidmore, CGP Grey, digitalshay, anokarina, Debbie Ramone, slightly everything, loop_oh, aaron_anderer, U.S. Marshals Service, tsuacctnt, Andrew Feinberg, Official U.S. Navy Imagery, Soggydan, Keith Bacongco, photosteve101, Emery Co Photo, futureatlas.com, david_terrar, weiss_paarz_photos, juanktru, Anh Le Tran's Photogphy, Amanda M Hatfield, IcronticPrime, Fibonacci Blue, blvesboy, Carl Montgomery, zappowbang, khawkins04, kennethkonica, opensourceway, Supernico26, mynameisharsha, JBrazito, Glyn Lowe Photoworks, Justin A. Wilcox, Wesley Fryer, MAClarke21, khalid Albaih, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff