The HMA Law Firm - Immigration & Criminal Defense Lawyers

Call: 703.964.0245

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Practice
    • Immigration >
      • Employment-Based Immigration >
        • The H-1B Visa
        • Investor and Intracompany Transfers (E & L Visas)
        • PERM Labor Certification >
          • Cross Chargeability
          • EB-5 Green Cards
      • Marriage & Fiancé Visas >
        • Special Service for Servicemen
        • Marriage Interview Questions
        • The I-751 Good Faith Waiver
        • Evidence for Filing an I-751
        • My I-751 Was Denied: Now What?
        • Same-Sex Marriage Immigration Issues
        • New 90 Day Rule
      • General Immigration >
        • Filing a FOIA from USCIS
        • Form G-639: How to Complete
        • Re-Entry Permits
        • TPS >
          • More on TPS
          • SYRIA TPS
          • TPS Yemen
        • U Visas
      • Legal Victories
      • How To Choose The Right Immigration Lawyer
      • Waivers (I-601/I-601A) >
        • Drunk Driving (DUI/DWI) and I-601/I-601A Waivers
      • Citizenship >
        • N-648 Medical Waivers
        • Naturalization Pitfalls
        • The Civics Test for Naturalization
        • Exceptions for English Test
        • Criminal Convictions and Naturalization
      • Mandamus: It's Taking Too Long >
        • Mandamus: What to Think, What to Expect
        • How an Immigration Writ of Mandamus Works
        • Petition for Hearing on Naturalization
      • Deportation Defense >
        • Overview of Removal Proceedings
        • Deportation: Preventive Maintenance
      • Deferred Action (DACA) >
        • To Lawyer Or Not To Lawyer
        • Applying for a Social Security Number
    • Criminal Defense >
      • Traffic Offenses
    • Learn >
      • Immigration In A Nutshell >
        • The Visa Bulletin and Family Immigration
      • Criminal Immigration Law 101 >
        • Know Your Rights
      • Eligibility for Citizenship >
        • Citizenship versus Naturalization
        • Why Become a Citizen?
  • Consult/Pay Fees
  • Testimonials
  • Careers
  • Blawg
  • En Español
    • Accion Ejecutiva
    • El Interdicto Temporal
    • Buscar Detenido
    • Reforma Inmigratoria
    • Papeles Por Los Indocumentados

The HMA Law Firm Blawg

    Question? Contact a lawyer now!

Submit

DACA Safe for Now

6/16/2017

1 Comment

 
Picture
DACA appears safe, for now. It seems media across the spectrum reports that it's a(nother) broken promise for Trump - with the Washington Times adding that the reversal "enrages conservative base" and the Daily Caller bemoaning that "100,000 illegals got amnesty in Trump's first three months." Rep. Steve King - who wonders how "we" can "restore our civilization with other people's babies" - has mulled bringing a lawsuit against Trump (I think that would be lawsuit #136 or thereabouts) to kill DACA. Obviously this isn't over yet.
​
But it is clearly a reversal of a campaign promise. I was certain that the first things Trump would do would be reinstate a Muslim registry and revoke DACA. (Silly me, it was a Muslim ban and ramped up ICE raids.)

But a few points:

  1. If DACA is ok, so was DAPA. The only real difference is number of people impacted. The legal authority is identical.
  2. The decision to keep DACA (for now) is political, not legal. That's a testament to the formidable power of the Dreamers, and a lesson to everyone else. It's also reassuring to see evidence of rational thought from the administration. But remember, there's no final decision. DACA can still be revoked at any time.
  3. I wouldn't let Trump's base forget that he bowed to the Dreamers. Or failed to repeal the ACA. Or kept the H-1B program. Or saw a use for NATO. Or backed off calling China a currency manipulator.
  4. A lawsuit by Steve King or anyone else wouldn't necessarily result in loss of DACA. Remember, DAPA wasn't killed, it stalled. It was a preliminary injunction; there was never a ruling on its ultimate constitutionality. To kill DACA, then, is an uphill battle for Steve King, even with Gorsuch on the bench. It also would presumably mean the Trump admin would be forced to defend DACA in court, multiple times. That won't go over well with his base. He could flip and revoke DACA after all, but doing that in response to a King lawsuit would galvanize Dreamers and their allies. Either way, the admin's in a pickle, and I think it makes sense for Dreamers to force the admin into a pro-DACA position it will have to defend.

1 Comment

We're Suing To Compel Disclosure of the Tanton Papers

6/3/2017

3 Comments

 
PictureDr. John Tanton

​Updates here; follow me on Facebook or on Twitter @HMAesq for notifications; on Twitter follow #TantonPapers. Last update: 09/30/2021

BACKGROUND

As an immigration lawyer and advocate, in the wake of ICE raids, stalled immigration reform, detention of children, denial of due process, ramped up deportations, and targeted travel bans, I am committed to stop what I see as the legalization of xenophobia which will have the effect of creating a permanent and disenfranchised underclass.


There is a purposeful and intentional movement to achieve that nefarious goal, to which there must be a purposeful and intentional response, and to thwart against which there should have been a purposeful and intentional movement.

There have been various anti-immigrant, exclusionary policies pushed over the past 15 years. Behind modern players like Kris Kobach, Jeff Sessions, Stephen Miller, Steve Bannon, and others in the new administration is the trifecta of anti-immigrant organizations: FAIR, NumbersUSA, and CIS. Like any organization, there have been lots of hands stirring the pot for a very long time. But sometimes, you can find a lynchpin. I believe one such lynchpin behind all three of these organizations is one man: John Tanton. 

Dr. Tanton is best described as an environmentalist turned immigration restrictionist, and someone at least sympathetic to white nationalism. The groups he founded and/or nurtured - FAIR, CIS, NumbersUSA, and other ones such as US Inc. and US English have collectively stalled meaningful immigration reform for decades. Kris Kobach is of counsel to the legal arm of FAIR. The former executive director, Julie Kirchner, is now the ombudsman of USCIS. FAIR's writeups strongly influence immigration policy, as in the case of the administration's "Declined Detainer Outcome Report." The list goes on.

These organizations inform US immigration policy, and Dr. Tanton was the grand wizard behind them. Bans, raids, private prisons, deportation as a cure-all, fanning hate of refugees and immigrants? Much of it traceable back to FAIR and, ultimately, Dr. Tanton.


THE TANTON PAPERS

Tanton was a prolific writer, thought leader, and connector. He has been suffering from Parkinson's and is apparently retired from public life, but his thought lives on.

His papers from 1960 to 2007 were donated to the University of Michigan's Bentley Historical Library and are currently located in 25 boxes. Boxes 1 - 14 are open without restriction, but boxes 15 - 25 are closed until April 6, 2035. 

The modern version of Tanton's thought has become White House immigration policy, and so far has a long way to go to be reversed by President Biden. I believed the public interest is served by investigating that connection. That means unsealing boxes 15 - 25.

What's in the Sealed Tanton Papers? According to the BHL, among other things:

  • Meeting minutes of FAIR from its inception in 1979
  • Nine folders labelled "Pioneer Fund" (a group founded to promote the genes of white colonials that funds studies of race, intelligence and genetics)
  • Voluminous folders on immigration, including state-specific tomes
  • Information on various other organizations including CIS, IRLI (to which Kobach has been of counsel for many years)
  • Dr. Tanton's private correspondence 
​
In short, the sealed Tanton papers will shine a light onto the conceptual foundations of the anti-immigrant movement, as well as its strategic plans and key players. It may help us understand the origins of the groups currently informing White House immigration policy, and how the thought evolved from Tanton's environmental concerns to the policies we've seen in 2017, including the Muslim bans, ICE raids, and ramped up enforcement.


THE FOIA ACTION

On December 16, 2016 I filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the University of Michigan. As expected, the University requested additional time. Eventually they responded, asking for a deposit to cover one-half of the estimated FOIA expenses.

The Southern Poverty Law Center and the Michigan chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations both recognized the importance of transparency here.  The SPLC has been reporting on the Tanton hate networks for decades. 

I sent in the money to the University, but on May 8, 2017 my request was denied. The University took the position that since the records were sealed, they were not "public records" within the meaning of the Michigan Freedom of Information Act.

I filed an appeal with the President of the University of Michigan on May 16, 2017. I argued that under binding Michigan Supreme Court precedent, the documents still were public records retained by a public body for an official purpose. The presence of some mysterious arrangement to seal the documents was simply apropos. I sent in a draft lawsuit, indicating my intent to avail of judicial process if the denial was not overturned.

On May 30, 2017, the President denied my appeal. Counsel for the President Liz Barry wrote the sealed papers were restricted due to a valid charitable gift agreement, and failure to abide by that agreement would chill potential future donors from donating key historical papers, undermining the University's essential function to preserve that history.

Having exhausted all options with the University, on Monday, June 12, 2017 I filed a lawsuit against the University seeking an order compelling production of the Sealed Tanton Papers. The case has been assigned number 17-000170-MZ by the Michigan Court of Claims. The suit was dismissed by the Court of Claims on Nov 20, 2017 and an appeal was filed to the Michigan Court of Appeals. Having been fully briefed, oral arguments were heard at 11 am on August 15, 2018.

On June 20, 2019, the Court of Appeals ruled in my favor, finding that the Court of Claims improperly dismissed the action, and all but finding that the Sealed Tanton Papers are public records under the Michigan FOIA. 

The University filed leave for appeal before the Michigan Supreme Court, which granted same, but ultimately ruled affirming the Court of Appeals decision on April 9, 2021. The case was remanded back to the Court of Claims, finally, for trial. The University, as expected, filed a Motion to Dismiss, which was denied on September 30, 2021.

The papers emphatically are public records. A public body like the University cannot insulate records from the Freedom of Information Act simply by private agreement, and that in any case, the public interest on these facts trumps whatever privacy or other interest may suggest against disclosure.

Instead of allowing a trial, the University sought leave to appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court. That request was granted, and oral arguments were held on January 6, 2021. A decision is forthcoming, hopefully by July 2021.

Ahmad v. University of Michigan: Timeline

Date
Document
Note
12/16/2016
Initial FOIA Request
Filed with U of M FOIA office.
5/8/2017
Denial of Initial FOIA
FOIA office says determination that Tanton Papers were not public records made after deposit was rec'd
5/16/2017
Appeal of FOIA Denial
Filed with Office of President, U of M
5/30/2017
Denial of FOIA Appeal
U of M says private charitable gift agreement takes Tanton Papers out of ambit of FOIA
6/12/2017
Lawsuit: Ahmad v. U of M
Filed after exhausting all appeals with U of M. Included as exhibits all correspondence to/from U of M FOIA office.
8/10/2017
Motion to Dismiss
Argues Tanton Papers are not public records because not "used" or "possessed" by public body until 2035; also privacy exemptions apply.
10/5/2017
Response to Motion To Dismiss
Argues official purpose in acquisition of papers triggers FOIA; premature to argue exemptions but public bodies cannot contract their way out of public policy.
11/3/2017
Reply to Response to MTD
Argues national immigration policy is not a stated purpose of Michigan FOIA; contravenes constitutional authority of Regents of U of M; there is no official function of the Tanton Papers hence, not FOIA-able.
11/20/2017
Order Granting Motion to Dismiss
The Michigan Court of Claims granted the University of Michigan's motion to dismiss, saying the records are not public. We will appeal.
2/21/2018
Opening Brief in Circuit Court
We engaged Philip Ellison, Esq. of Outside Legal Counsel, a FOIA law firm, and appealed the grant of the Motion to Dismiss to the Michigan Court of Appeals. We argued the Tanton Papers are unquestionably public records, and a private gift agreement does not insulate them from FOIA.
3/18/2018
Motion To Expedite Scheduling Order
Mr. Ellison requests the Court of Appeals to expedite our case by treating it as a priority.
3/28/2018
Order granting Motion to Expedite
The Court of Appeals agrees to treat this lawsuit as a priority.
3/28/2018
University of Michigan's Response Brief
U of M argues the Tanton Papers are not public records because they aren't possessed for any official function, and besides frustrating the purposes of FOIA, infringes on the University's constitutional autonomy. 
4/18/2018
Reply to U of M's Response Brief
The dismissal below still assumed facts not in evidence (the donor gift agreement) and even if there wasn't procedural error, the University's arguments are without merit.
8/15/2018
Oral Arguments
Both sides presented oral arguments before the Court of Appeals in Detroit.
6/20/2019
Order of Mich. Court of Appeals: Reversed and Remanded
Court of Claims improperly dismissed lawsuit; Plaintiff pled sufficient facts to allege the Tanton Papers were public records subject to FOIA.
07/31/2019
U of M's Motion for Leave to Appeal to Michigan Supreme Court
U of M takes unusual step of attempting appeal of our win at the Court of Appeals when the gift agreement between Tanton & UM has yet to be produced.
09/18/2019
Opposition to Motion for Leave to Appeal
Opposition argues case has no record; best to let case develop before bringing before Mich Supreme Court
03/06/2020
Order Granting Motion for Leave to Appeal
Appeal is allowed by MSC, now await oral argument (slowed due to COVID-19)
01/06/2021
Oral Argument
Oral argument before Michigan Supreme Court (watch)
04/09/2021
Order Affirming Court of Appeals
Michigan Supreme Court affirms order of Court of Appeals; case remanded back to Court of Claims for trial
09/30/2021
Order denying UM Motion to Dismiss
UM argues gift agreement should be applied to FOIA personal/privacy exemption; Court disagrees; orders UM to provide Vaughn index within 28 days.

Media Coverage

Latino Rebels, We’re Suing to Compel Disclosure of the Tanton Papers (Jun 6, 2017)
Ann Arbor News, University of Michigan sued over anti-immigration activist's records (Jun 20, 2017)
Patriot Not Partisan, Why You Need To Know Dr. John Tanton, Founder Of The Anti-Immigrant Movement (Aug 15, 2017)
Detroit Free Press, University of Michigan blocks release of hot-button records of anti-immigrant leader (Oct 17, 2017)
​Michigan Daily, Bentley Library faces lawsuit over access to anti-immigration activist’s documents (Oct 18, 2017)
El Vocero Hispano, Universidad de Michigan bloquea publicación de documentos controversiales de líder antiinmigrante (Oct 20, 2017)
Univision Noticias, ¿Qué quiere decir Trump cuando habla de acabar con la 'migración en cadena'? ​(Jan 15, 2018)
Splinter News, The Eugenicist Doctor and the Vast Fortune Behind Trump’s Immigration Regime (Jul 5, 2018)
Michigan Radio, Suit seeks anti-immigration documents from UM (Aug 15, 2018)
Detroit News, Lawyer fights UM to see immigration foe's papers (Aug 15, 2018)
America's Voice, As Events This Week Prove, Anti-Immigrant Hate Groups Are in Control With the Trump Administration (Aug 15, 2018)
Detroit Free Press, Anti-immigrant leader focus of 10 secret boxes at U-M library (Aug 16, 2018)
Daily Beast, University Fights to Keep Anti-Immigration Leader John Tanton's Papers Secret (Sep 2, 2018)
Library Journal, 
Attorney Sues for Access to Tanton Papers in Closed Archive (Sep 18, 2018)
Daily Beast, Fighting White Nationalism Is Necessary, but Not Sufficient​ (Mar 16, 2019) [OP-ED]
Detroit News, Appeals Court Rules Against UM in Bid to Keep Immigration Foe's Documents Private (Jun 21, 2019)
Detroit Metro Times, Appeal court rules against U-M in case to keep anti-immigration leader's documents sealed (Jun 22, 2019)
Michigan Daily, Appeal court rules ‘U’ to release anti-immigration documents (Jun 24, 2019)
Detroit Free Press, Appeals Court favors release of University of Michigan records of anti-immigrant leader (Jul 6, 2019)
Los Angeles Times, John Tanton, quiet architect of America’s modern-day anti-immigrant movement, dies at 85 (Jul 18, 2019)
Detroit Free Press, Anti-immigrant leader Dr. John Tanton of Michigan dies at 85 (Jul 18, 2019)
Washington Post, John Tanton, architect of anti-immigration and English-only efforts, dies at 85 (Jul 21, 2019)
Blue Virginia, The Terrifying Anti-Immigrant Agenda of John Tanton, Who Died Last Tuesday, Is Also Donald Trump’s Agenda ​(Jul 22, 2019)
Slate, The Godfather of the Anti-Immigration Movement [Podcast] (Jul 29, 2019)
Detroit Free Press, University of Michigan fights to keep files of anti-immigrant leader sealed (Aug 29, 2019)
Michigan Daily, Petition demands ‘U’ release documents of anti-immigration advocate ​(Sep 11, 2019)
The Intercept, Newspapers Quoted Anti-Immigrant Groups as Expert Sources (Sep 12, 2019)
Pittsburgh City Paper, How Pittsburgh’s Colcom Foundation is 'greenwashing' its anti-immigrant message ​(Mar 11, 2020)
WILX, Michigan’s top court takes case involving documents at U-M (Mar 15, 2020)
Michigan Live, State Supreme Court to hear case on anti-immigration activist’s papers housed at University of Michigan (Dec 29, 2020)
Detroit News, UM Tells Supreme Court anti-immigration activist's documents not public records (Jan 6, 2021)
Virginia Mercury, A Virginia attorney has been seeking sealed papers from a major anti-immigrant activist for years. What do they show? (Jan 7, 2021)
3 Comments
    DISCLAIMER: If a blog post you read here contains case results, be advised that case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case.

    Authors

    Sharifa Abbasi, Esq.
    Hassan M. Ahmad, Esq.
    Humza Kazmi, Esq.
    Faisal Khan
    ​Valeria Prudencio
    Carly Stadum-Liang, Esq.

    Archives

    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    May 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    August 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    July 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010

    Categories

    All
    Appellate
    Asylum
    CBP
    Citizenship
    Constitutional Rights
    Criminal
    DACA
    Deportation
    Family
    Framing
    General
    H 1B
    H-1B
    Hma Law Firm
    Immigration
    Immigration Policy
    Immigration Reform
    International
    Interns
    Muslim Ban
    National Security
    Politics
    Removal
    Syria
    Tanton FOIA Lawsuit
    Trump
    Waivers

    RSS Feed

Quick Links

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Executive Action
  • Consult

Contact Info

6 Pidgeon Hill DR., Suite 330,
Sterling, VA 20165, USA

Tel:  703.964.0245

Fax: 703.997.8556
Email: [email protected]

Subscribe to the HMA LawFeed

Picture

​Pay Fees Here

Book you consult online by clicking on this link now!

©2009 - 2021 by Hassan M. Ahmad. All rights reserved. No portion of this website may be copied or reproduced for any purpose without express written permission.

Photos from Beshroffline, Thorne Enterprises, alex-s, swanksalot, 401(K) 2012, hyku, Gage Skidmore, Gage Skidmore, michaeln3, Antony J Shepherd, Korean Resource Center 민족학교, Don Fulano, lewebafricain, Images_of_Money, Lord Jim, Kevinth Nunez, Joe Crimmings Photography, Cohen.Canada, Thane Eichenauer, Gage Skidmore, CGP Grey, digitalshay, anokarina, Debbie Ramone, slightly everything, loop_oh, aaron_anderer, U.S. Marshals Service, tsuacctnt, Andrew Feinberg, Official U.S. Navy Imagery, Soggydan, Keith Bacongco, photosteve101, Emery Co Photo, futureatlas.com, david_terrar, weiss_paarz_photos, juanktru, Anh Le Tran's Photogphy, Amanda M Hatfield, IcronticPrime, Fibonacci Blue, blvesboy, Carl Montgomery, zappowbang, khawkins04, kennethkonica, opensourceway, Supernico26, mynameisharsha, JBrazito, Glyn Lowe Photoworks, Justin A. Wilcox, Wesley Fryer, MAClarke21, khalid Albaih, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Rod Waddington, CreditDebitPro, amtec_photos, Ungry Young Man, greencandy8888, Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com, Andrew Cheal, Jens Rost, Tiocfaidh ár lá 1916, State Farm, Daquella manera, wahousegop, ShanMcG213, IndivisibleSF, gruntzooki, Abode of Chaos