The HMA Law Firm - Immigration & Criminal Defense Lawyers

Call: 703.964.0245

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Practice
    • Immigration >
      • Employment-Based Immigration >
        • The H-1B Visa
        • Investor and Intracompany Transfers (E & L Visas)
        • PERM Labor Certification >
          • Cross Chargeability
          • EB-5 Green Cards
      • Marriage & Fiancé Visas >
        • Special Service for Servicemen
        • Marriage Interview Questions
        • The I-751 Good Faith Waiver
        • Evidence for Filing an I-751
        • My I-751 Was Denied: Now What?
        • Same-Sex Marriage Immigration Issues
        • New 90 Day Rule
      • General Immigration >
        • Filing a FOIA from USCIS
        • Form G-639: How to Complete
        • Re-Entry Permits
        • TPS >
          • More on TPS
          • SYRIA TPS
          • TPS Yemen
        • U Visas
      • Legal Victories
      • How To Choose The Right Immigration Lawyer
      • Waivers (I-601/I-601A) >
        • Drunk Driving (DUI/DWI) and I-601/I-601A Waivers
      • Citizenship >
        • N-648 Medical Waivers
        • Naturalization Pitfalls
        • The Civics Test for Naturalization
        • Exceptions for English Test
        • Criminal Convictions and Naturalization
      • Mandamus: It's Taking Too Long >
        • Mandamus: What to Think, What to Expect
        • How an Immigration Writ of Mandamus Works
        • Petition for Hearing on Naturalization
      • Deportation Defense >
        • Overview of Removal Proceedings
        • Deportation: Preventive Maintenance
      • Deferred Action (DACA) >
        • To Lawyer Or Not To Lawyer
        • Applying for a Social Security Number
    • Criminal Defense >
      • Traffic Offenses
    • Learn >
      • Immigration In A Nutshell >
        • The Visa Bulletin and Family Immigration
      • Criminal Immigration Law 101 >
        • Know Your Rights
      • Eligibility for Citizenship >
        • Citizenship versus Naturalization
        • Why Become a Citizen?
  • Consult/Pay Fees
  • Testimonials
  • Careers
  • Blawg
  • En Español
    • Accion Ejecutiva
    • El Interdicto Temporal
    • Buscar Detenido
    • Reforma Inmigratoria
    • Papeles Por Los Indocumentados

The HMA Law Firm Blawg

    Question? Contact a lawyer now!

Submit

The Virginia Supreme Court Set Up A Great Fall...

11/30/-0001

1 Comment

 
..for immigrants who got the short end of the stick.  On January 13, 2011 the Virginia Supreme Court reversed two circuit court decisions in which the judges had modified the defendants\' sentences on grounds of their having received bad advice (or no advice) on the immigration consequences of their pleas.  The VSC ruled that the ancient writs of coram nobis (or coram vobis) and audita querela are not available in Virginia to modify sentences, even though the US Supreme Court in Padilla v. Kentucky clearly found constitutional deficiencies in such sentences.

The cases were Commonwealth v. Chan and Commonwealth v. Morris.  You can find the opinion here.

To understand this decision, it\'s important to contextualize a little bit.  In both of these cases, the defendants were charged with grand larceny.  They were green card holders (lawful permanent residents) and pleaded guilty to petit larceny and were given 365 day suspended sentences.  Unfortunately, this qualifies as an aggravated felony under immigration law (INA 101(a)(43)(G)) because it is a crime of theft and the sentence imposed (though suspended) was 1 year or more.  Had the lawyers known this, they would have asked for a 364 day sentence.  That one day makes a lot of difference.  They didn\'t get the chance.

Ever since Congress created this term \"aggravated felony\" the types of crimes that are covered have been expanded.  What\'s more, aggravated felonies are retroactive, so someone who thought (correctly) that their conviction was not an aggravated felony may later find that his conviction has in fact become an aggravated felony.  Many aggravated felonies are what we would expect: murder, rape, sexual abuse of a minor, trafficking, terrorism, etc.  But there are some crimes that are classified as aggravated felonies that don\'t sound like it.  Case in point: petty larceny with a 365 day sentence.  You could get this for stealing a bag of chips from the grocery store.  Sure, it\'s wrong behavior, but does it make sense to call it an \"aggravated felony\" putting it into the same category as a murderer, rapist, sexual deviant, drug trafficker, or terrorist?

As the US Supreme Court observed in Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 560 U.S. ____ (2010) \"Congress, like “Humpty Dumpty,” has the power to give words unorthodox meanings.\" 

“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”

-Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass (1872)

So Congress apparently can call petty larceny (which is not even a felony in Virginia) an aggravated felony.  And this is the result.  Virginia law provides for very limited rights to change or modify a sentence after a certain period of time.  Up until the Chan and Morris decisions, there existed the writs of coram nobis and audita querela to correct errors in judgments to bring them in line with the US Constitution.  The VSC has now taken those writs away, at least for correcting this type of error.  One major problem with the Court\'s decision is that it leaves no option for defendants who want to cure the constitutional deficiencies in their sentences.  It merely notes that these defendants may have had a successful claim if they had filed a habeus petition (see Va. Code 8.01-654 et seq.)  but none of them did so.  So just like that - a defendant who received wrong (or no) advice from their lawyer loses the right to remain in the United States.  For the legal equivalent of stealing a bag
1 Comment
brazilian hair uk link
10/10/2014 08:47:28 pm

It truly is good sense connected with emergency to get available completely new in addition to attracting merchandise that's maintained these individuals as one of the high level Switzerland check out corporations on this planet.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    DISCLAIMER: If a blog post you read here contains case results, be advised that case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case.

    Authors

    Sharifa Abbasi, Esq.
    Hassan M. Ahmad, Esq.
    Humza Kazmi, Esq.
    Faisal Khan
    ​Valeria Prudencio
    Carly Stadum-Liang, Esq.

    Archives

    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    May 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    August 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    July 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010

    Categories

    All
    Appellate
    Asylum
    CBP
    Citizenship
    Constitutional Rights
    Criminal
    DACA
    Deportation
    Family
    Framing
    General
    H 1B
    H-1B
    Hma Law Firm
    Immigration
    Immigration Policy
    Immigration Reform
    International
    Interns
    Muslim Ban
    National Security
    Politics
    Removal
    Syria
    Tanton FOIA Lawsuit
    Trump
    Waivers

    RSS Feed

Quick Links

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Executive Action
  • Consult

Contact Info

8133 Leesburg Pike, Ste 801
Vienna VA 22182

Tel:  703.964.0245

Fax: 703.997.8556
Email: info@hmalegal.com

Subscribe to the HMA LawFeed

Picture

​Pay Fees Here

Book you consult online by clicking on this link now!

©2009 - 2021 by Hassan M. Ahmad. All rights reserved. No portion of this website may be copied or reproduced for any purpose without express written permission.

Photos used under Creative Commons from Beshroffline, Thorne Enterprises, alex-s, swanksalot, 401(K) 2012, hyku, Gage Skidmore, Gage Skidmore, michaeln3, Antony J Shepherd, Korean Resource Center 민족학교, Don Fulano, lewebafricain, Images_of_Money, Lord Jim, Kevinth Nunez, Joe Crimmings Photography, Cohen.Canada, Thane Eichenauer, Gage Skidmore, CGP Grey, digitalshay, anokarina, Debbie Ramone, slightly everything, loop_oh, aaron_anderer, U.S. Marshals Service, tsuacctnt, Andrew Feinberg, Official U.S. Navy Imagery, Soggydan, Keith Bacongco, photosteve101, Emery Co Photo, futureatlas.com, david_terrar, weiss_paarz_photos, juanktru, Anh Le Tran's Photogphy, Amanda M Hatfield, IcronticPrime, Fibonacci Blue, blvesboy, Carl Montgomery, zappowbang, khawkins04, kennethkonica, opensourceway, Supernico26, mynameisharsha, JBrazito, Glyn Lowe Photoworks, Justin A. Wilcox, Wesley Fryer, MAClarke21, khalid Albaih, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff